Overview of 2015 Accountability PDF of PowerPoint presentation that describes the 2015 accountability systemĬomparison of 20 performance indices (Non-AEAs) Side-by-side comparison showing the changes in performance index indicators and targets for non-AEAs from 2014 to 2015Ĭomparison of 20 performance indices (AEAs) Side-by-side comparison showing the changes in performance index indicators and targets for AEAs from 2014 to 2015
Infographic Video and accompanying one-page summary Overview of the state accountability systemĪ Spanish version is also available: Información en Español.
#TAE GWANG WHO ARE YOU SCHOOL 2015 MANUAL#
Multi-Year Improvement Required All districts, campuses, and charters in Texas rated Improvement Required or Academically Unacceptable for one or more consecutive years grouped by number of consecutive IR/AU ratings and listed numerically by district ID (from lowest to highest)ĭownload Accountability data for all districts and campuses in Texas available in Excel, comma-delimited format, or tab-delimited formatĭistinction Designations All districts, campuses, and charters in Texas that earned at least one distinction designation listed alphabetically by districtĬampus Distinctions All campuses in Texas that earned at least one distinction designation grouped by count of distinctions earned (from highest to lowest) and listed alphabetically by campusĬampuses Receiving All Available Distinctions All campuses in Texas that earned every distinction designation for which they were eligible listed alphabetically by districtĪcademic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading All campuses in Texas that earned the Academic Achievement in English Language Art/Reading distinction designation listed alphabetically by districtĪll campuses in Texas that earned the Academic Achievement in Mathematics distinction designation listed alphabetically by districtĪcademic Achievement in Science All campuses in Texas that earned the Academic Achievement in Science distinction designation listed alphabetically by districtĪll campuses in Texas that earned the Academic Achievement in Social Studies distinction designation listed alphabetically by districtĪll campuses in Texas that earned the Top 25 Percent Student Progress distinction designation listed alphabetically by districtĪll campuses in Texas that earned the Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps distinction designation listed alphabetically by districtĪll campuses in Texas that earned the Postsecondary Readiness distinction designation listed alphabetically by districtĪll districts and charter operators in Texas that earned the Postsecondary Readiness distinction designation listed alphabeticallyĢ015 Accountability Manual Description of the 2015 accountability system and explanation of how accountability ratings are assigned and distinction designations are awarded
Highlights of 2015 Accountability Results Narrative that summarizes the ratings statewide State Summary Tables that detail statewide accountability ratings and distinction designations by district, campus, charter, and school type
Ratings by ESC All districts, campuses, and charters in Texas alphabetized by district and grouped by education service center regionĬharter All charters in Texas listed alphabetically by district In a District All campuses in a district listed alphabeticallyĪll Districts by Rating All districts in Texas listed alphabetically and grouped by ratingīy Rating All campuses in Texas listed alphabetically and grouped by ratingĪll Campuses by Rating and School Type All campuses in Texas listed alphabetically and grouped by school type and rating The following links provide accountability ratings for all ESC regions, districts, and campuses from several different perspectives and provide additional information related to the ratings.Ĭampuses, and charters in Texas listed alphabetically by district State accountability reports and data tables are also available by ESC region and for the state. Click a link to access accountability summaries, which show accountability ratings and distinction designations, and tables showing the data used to assign the ratings and award distinctions. The 2015 accountability ratings and reports are available at the links below.
0 kommentar(er)
